In case you haven’t spotted it yet, it’s not “…could of bought…”, it’s “could have bought…”. Seriously, who checks this stuff before printing?
Copyright Don Packett 1980-2080 (Yup, I'm going for the hundred)
Poor @WOOLWORTHS_SA grammar
February 22nd, 2011 Posted by Don Packett Uncategorized 8 thoughts on “Poor @WOOLWORTHS_SA grammar”
Lol Woolies grammer – thats a shocker!
Lol Woolies grammer – thats a shocker!
NOTHING irritates me more than bad grammar, especially the could of/would of/should of phenomena. aaargh. I would HAVE thought that Woolworths could afford better copywriters.
NOTHING irritates me more than bad grammar, especially the could of/would of/should of phenomena. aaargh. I would HAVE thought that Woolworths could afford better copywriters.
oh wow… *twitch* *twitch*
oh wow… *twitch* *twitch*
That annoys me like nothing else on earth. If the concatenation is could’ve, then surely the "ve" at the end gives you some kind of clue?
That annoys me like nothing else on earth. If the concatenation is could’ve, then surely the "ve" at the end gives you some kind of clue?